APRIL 2022

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 04 APRIL 2022
Synergy of Penta Helix Plus in Reclamation Activities: Study of Mining Strategies in Pasuruan Regency
1Misbahul Munir, 2Moh Bisri, 3Fadillah Putra
1,2,3Posgraduate Program of Universitas Brawijaya Malang, Veteran Street , Ketawanggede, Lowokwaru, Malang City, East Java, 65145
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i4-23

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The Penta helix is a part of public policy, but in some cases, the Penta helix can become a standard for handling mining through reclamation. The involvement of Penta helix plus actors in overseeing mining activities to become Sustainable Mining Practices where there is reclamation in ex-mining areas that are beneficial to the surrounding area. This research method uses a mixed-method by combining qualitative data from interviews, documentation, and observations with quantitative data in the form of questions, then conclusions are drawn. This research shows that Penta helix plus is an alternative for handling mining that involves many parties and becomes an ideal new pattern. Penta helix plus offers a new formulation for synergistic public participation in controlling exploitation activities and hoping for reclamation activities. The involvement of the Penta helix plus also cannot be separated from the elements of communication and coordination as the main indicator in synergy.

KEYWORDS:

Penta helix plus, reclamation, Sustainable Mining Practices, Environment.

REFERENCES

1) Ahlf, H., Horak, S., Klein, A., & Yoon, S. W. (2019). Demographic homophily, communication and trust in intra-organizational business relationships. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 34, Issue 2

2) Almeida, J., Ribeiro, A. B., Silva, A. S., & Faria, P. (2020). Overview of mining residues incorporation in construction materials and barriers for full-scale application. Journal of Building Engineering, 29, 101215.

3) Astuti, R. S., & Asmarasari, B. (2020, January). Collaborative Governance in Policy Advocacy of Exclusive Breastfeeding Practice in Semarang City. In 3rd International Conference on Social Transformation, Community, and Sustainable Development (ICSTCSD 2019) (Vol. 389, pp. 188-192).

4) Bascopé, M., Perasso, P., & Reiss, K. (2019). Systematic review of education for sustainable development at an early stage: Cornerstones and pedagogical approaches for teacher professional development. Sustainability, 11(3), 719.

5) Budhi, M. K. S., Lestari, N. P. N. E., & Suasih, N. N. R. (2022). The Recovery of The Tourism Industry in Bali Province Through The Penta-Helix Collaboration Strategy in The New Normal Era. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, 40(1), 167-174.

6) Cooren, F. (2018). Materializing communication: Making the case for a relational ontology. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 278-288.

7) Creswell, J. W. (2015). Revisiting mixed methods and advancing scientific practices. The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry.

8) Dwijayanti, Paulina. 2012. “Komunikasi Dan Koordinasi Yang Sinergi Antara Pemerintah Desa Dan Bpd Dalam Pembuatan Peraturan Desa.” GOVERNANCE, Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan 1(1)

9) Emmanuel, A. Y., Jerry, C. S., & Dzigbodi, D. A. (2018). Review of environmental and health impacts of mining in Ghana. Journal of Health and Pollution, 8(17), 43-52.

10) Ericsson, M., & Löf, O. (2019). Mining’s contribution to national economies between 1996 and 2016. Mineral Economics, 32(2), 223-250.

11) Espinosa-Reyes, G., González-Mille, D. J., Ilizaliturri-Hernández, C. A., Mejía-Saavedra, J., Cilia-López, V. G., Costilla-Salazar, R., & Díaz-Barriga, F. (2014). Effect of mining activities in biotic communities of Villa de la Paz, San Luis Potosi, Mexico. BioMed Research International, 2014.

12) Hardiantoa, W. T., Sumartonob, M. R., Mulukc, K., & Wijayad, F. (2019). PentaHelix Synergy on Tourism Development in Batu, East Java. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(6).

13) Johnson, B., Christensen, L. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

14) Katoria, D., Sehgal, D., & Kumar, S. (2013). Environment impact assessment of coal mining. International Journal of Environmental Engineering and Management, 4(3), 245-250.

15) Kaźmierczak, U., Malewski, J., & Strzałkowski, P. (2019). The concept of forecasting the reclamation costin rock mining. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi-Mineral Resources Management, 163-176.

16) Kurniawan, A. R., & Surono, W. (2013). Model reklamasi tambang rakyat berwawasan lingkungan: Tinjauan atas reklamasi lahan bekas tambang batu apung ijobalit, Kabupaten Lombok Timur, Propinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat. Jurnal Teknologi Mineral dan Batubara, 9(3), 165-174.

17) Najiyati, S., & Susilo, S. R. T. (2011). Sinergitas instansi pemerintah dalam pembangunan Kota Terpadu Mandiri. Jurnal ketransmigrasian, 28(2), 113-124.

18) Nghargbu, R., & Iyakwari, S. (2020). Geopolitical Concerns Arising from Mining Activities in Some Parts of Nigeria and Cameroon. Geoconservation Research, 3(1), 1-11.

19) Novita, A. A. (2018). Collaborative Governance dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup di Kawasan Pertambangan. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 4(1), 27-35.

20) Pereira, K. (2012). Sand mining: The high volume–low value paradox. Coastal care. Retrieved November, 20, 2013.

21) Popović, V., Miljković, J. Ž., Subić, J., Jean-Vasile, A., Adrian, N., & Nicolăescu, E. (2015). Sustainable land management in mining areas in Serbia and Romania. Sustainability, 7(9), 11857-11877.

22) Putnam, L. L., & Nicotera, A. M. (2009). Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication. Routledge.

23) Sdino, L., Rosasco, P., & Dell’Ovo, M. (2020, May). Reclamation Cost: An Ecosystem Perspective. In International Symposium: New Metropolitan Perspectives (pp. 1352-1358). Springer, Cham.

24) Shi, Q., Lin, Y., Zhang, E., Yan, H., & Zhan, J. (2013). Impacts of cultivated land reclamation on the climate and grain production in Northeast China in the future 30 years. Advances in Meteorology, 2013.

25) Stipanović, C., Rudan, E., & Zubović, V. (2019). Cultural and Creative industries in Urban Tourism innovation–The example of the City of Rijeka. Tourism in South East Europe..., 5, 655-666..

26) Swab, R. M., Lorenz, N., Byrd, S., & Dick, R. (2017). Native vegetation in reclamation: Improving habitat and ecosystem function through using prairie species in mine land reclamation. Ecological Engineering, 108, 525-536.

27) Van den Broek, J., Benneworth, P., & Rutten, R. (2018). Border blocking effects in collaborative firm innovation. European Planning Studies, 26(7), 1330-1346.

28) Vishwanath, A. E., Sharmada, B. K., Pai, S. S., Tubaki, R., Neelima, K., & Nelivigi, N. (2014). Penta-V Helix: a modified Quad helix for correction of bilateral dentoalveolar cross bite. International Journal of Orthodontics (Milwaukee, Wis.), 25(4), 13-15.

29) Worlanyo, A. S., & Jiangfeng, L. (2021). Evaluating the environmental and economic impact of mining for post-mined land restoration and land-use: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 279, 111623.

30) Yuniarti, D. S. (2019). Prinsip Reasonableness Dalam Penilaian Tanggung Jawab Sosial Dan Lingkungan Investor Pertambangan Menurut Hukum Investasi Internasional. Jurist-Diction, 2(3), 873-890.

31) Yusuf, I., Purwana, D., & Buchdadi, A. D. (2022). The Influence of Interpersonal Communication, Universal-Diverse Orientation (UDO), and Self-Efficacy on the Quality of Administrative Services at State University of Jakarta. International Journal for Applied Information Management, 2(2), 97-105.

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 04 APRIL 2022

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar